Debated Texts

Professional scholars who believe in the deity of Christ admit:

But we shall find that on almost every occasion in the New Testament on which Jesus seems to be called God there is a problem either of textual criticism or of translation. In almost every case we have to discuss which of two readings is to be accepted or which of two possible translations is to be accepted. -- William Barclay, "Jesus as They Saw Him" (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1978), 21

Belief in the deity of Christ has traditionally been the keystone of the doctrine of the Trinity, yet explicit references to Jesus as "God" in the New Testament are very few, and even those few are generally plagued with uncertainties of either text or interpretation. -- Christopher Kaiser, "The Doctrine of God" (London: Marshall Morgan & Scott, 1982) 29.

No one ... can help being impressed by the remarkable reserve of the NT writers in applying the term θεὸς to Jesus. ... If the writers of the NT were persuaded of the deity of Christ, what accounts for their reticence to ascribe to him the title that, of all the divine names, would seem most explicitly to affirm that deity? Have the fathers and the creeds of the church outstripped the NT evidence in speaking so plainly and so often of Jesus Christ as "God"? ... It is a curious fact that each of the texts to be examined contains an interpretative problem of some description actually, most contains two or three. -- Murray J. Harris, "Jesus as God" (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 1992), 9-11.

Evidence Murray Harris use to proof the divinity of Jesus is: John 1:1,18; 20:28; Acts 20:28; Romans 9:5; Titus 2:13; Hebrews 1:8; 2 Peter 1:1; 1 John 5:20

No author of a Synoptic Gospel explicitly ascribe the title θεὸς to Jesus. Jesus never used the term θεὸς for himself. No sermon in the book of Acts attributes the title θεὸς to Jesus ... And possibly the biggest problem for NT Christology regarding this topic is that textual variants exist in every potential passage where Jesus is explicitly referred to as θεὸς. -- Brian J. Wright, "Jesus as θεὸς: A Textual Examination" in Revisiting the Corruption of the New Testament, ed. Daniel B. Wallace (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2011), 229-31.

As the above authors admitted themselves, none of the proven texts are strong arguments for the deity of Jesus. What are textually certain about Jesus are texts about his: birth, humanity, miracles, teachings, 12 disciples, death by crucifixion, resurrections, ascension and his return. If there are so many clear and certain texts about Jesus, why is the "fundamental truth about the deity of Christ" so obscure?

Deity Interpretations

Tip

The categories describe the rebuttals in the Scripture Interpretations tables below.

CategoryMeaning
Claim AttributionReaders differ over whose claim or perspective a statement represents, and whether the author endorses it.
Concept ConfusionReaders interpret abstract concepts like plans, promises, representations as literal states or events.
Grammar & ScopeReaders differ over grammatical relationships, clause attachments, or the scope of qualifiers, negation, or modifiers.
Referent IDReaders identify different people, things, or events through a pronoun, title, or description.
SymbolismReaders interpret symbolic images or messages as literal descriptions.
Textual VariationDifferent manuscript readings may mean readers are not comparing identical wording.
TopicReaders differ over which issue or topic the statement addresses in context.
TranslationBiased translation that does not follow the original manuscirpts mislead readers.
Word MeaningReaders assign different senses to the same word or title.
ScriptureDivine Jesus InterpretationRebuttal
John 5:18"making himself coequal with God"Claim Attribution: Charge reflects opponents’ conclusion, not claim of Jesus.
John 20:28Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!”Word Meaning: Here "God" means Christ.
Galatians 1:1"nor through man, but through Jesus Christ"Topic: about authority, not humanity.
Titus 2:13"our great God and Savior Jesus Christ"Grammar & Scope: Jesus = "the glory of our great God..."
Hebrews 1:3"the exact imprint of His nature"Translation: "person" was changed to "nature"
Revelation 22:13"I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and last"Word Meaning: "Alpha and Omega", "first and last" not unique to God alone.

Preexistance Interpretations

ScriptureDivine Jesus InterpretationRebuttal
John 3:13"Descended from heaven"Textual Variation: Changes meaning of "heaven".
John 6:38-62"Come down from heaven"Grammar & Scope: Narrator's comment confused with Jesus.
John 16:28"Come from God"Topic: Jesus announces end of his ministry, not incarnation.
John 17:5Glory before the world existedConcept Confusion: Jesus did not pre-exist literally, but in God's foretold plan (word).

Creator Interpretations

ScriptureDivine Jesus InterpretationRebuttal
Genesis 1:26"man in Our image", implying human Jesus = GodWord Meaning: "image" means representative not same essence. Applies to all humanity.
1 Corinthians 8:6“through whom are all things”Topic: food offered to idols, not an account of creation.
Colossians 1:13-17“For by him all things were created”Grammar & Scope: “all things” refer to authorities, not creation.
Hebrews 1:1-2“through whom also He made the worlds”Word Meaning: “worlds” (aión) can mean ages or spans of time.
Revelation 10:5-6Jesus is viewed as the mighty angelReferent ID: the Creator is the Father, by whom the angel swears.

Omnipresence Interpretations

ScriptureDivine Jesus InterpretationRebuttal
Matthew 18:20Jesus is present wherever followers gather in his name.Word Meaning: disciplinary context and Paul's comparable “presence in spirit” show that presence language need not mean omnipresence.
Matthew 28:20Jesus is with all his disciples always.Topic: Jesus promises continuing mission support, not explicit personal presence everywhere.
Acts 18:9-10“I am with you” means Jesus is present with Paul.Referent ID: the speaker is unidentified; Word Meaning: even if Jesus, assurance of help and protection does not establish presence everywhere.
Acts 23:11The Lord stood beside Paul.Topic: a particular encounter or reassurance does not establish simultaneous presence everywhere.
John 3:13Jesus was in heaven while on earth.Textual Variation: the longer textual variant is disputed; compare Bible translations.
John 14:20-23Jesus lives in every believer.Word Meaning: "in" links love, obedience and relationship, not physical location inside believers.
Ephesians 1:22-23Jesus “fills all in all”.Topic: the context concerns Jesus' authority and relationship to the church, not a claim that he personally occupies every location.
Ephesians 4:10Jesus ascended to “fill all things”.Topic: the passage concerns gifts and building his body; his work's reach does not establish personal omnipresence.
Revelation 2:1Jesus walks among churches in different places.Symbolism: walking among seven churches means symbolic oversight, not personal presence everywhere.

Body of God Interpretations

ScriptureDivine Jesus InterpretationRebuttal
John 1:1-18"The Word became flesh"Concept Confusion: "Word" never means Christ literally.
Philippians 2:6-8"Form Of God, Likeness of Men"Translation: multiple errors: changing tense, adding words, changing words
Colossians 1:14"Redemption through his blood"Textual Variation: "through his blood" was added in later manuscripts.
Colossians 2:9"God in a human body"Translation: "whole fullness of deity dwells" referring to truth not essence
1 Timothy 3:16"God manifested in flesh"Translation: Should be "he (Jesus) manifested in flesh"
1 John 4:2"Christ has come in flesh"Topic: Adressing Docetism, not affirming preexistance

Warning

See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. — Colossians 2:8 (ESV)

If Christ did not directly teach something, we should not read later philosophies back into biblical text according to human (church) traditions.

We should let the Bible form our theology (understanding of God), not the other way around.